Comments on this forum should never be taken as investment advice.
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Conversion of Natural Gas pipelines to Hydrogen?
Key research and development areas for hydrogen pipeline coatings:
key hydrogen pipeline conversion projects that have been announced or are underway: Major European Projects: H2ercule (Netherlands/Germany) Converting existing natural gas pipelines Gasunie and TenneT involvement North Sea to Ruhr region industrial corridor Focus on industrial hydrogen transport European Hydrogen Backbone Multiple countries involved ~75% planned to use converted gas pipelines Phased approach through 2040 Mix of new and converted infrastructure North American Projects: HyBlend (US DOE project) Testing different blend percentages Material compatibility studies Multiple pipeline operators involved Focus on partial hydrogen blending Asia-Pacific: Japan's Hydrogen Pipeline Initiatives Primarily new construction rather than conversion Some testing of existing infrastructure Focus on industrial ports Key Technical Learnings: Pipeline Assessment Methods Material testing protocols Inspection requirements Fitness-for-service criteria Conversion Approaches Section-by-section conversion Parallel system operation Purging and commissioning procedures
Disclaimer: The author of this post, may or may not be a shareholder of any of the companies mentioned in this column. No company mentioned has sponsored or paid for this content. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Major Areas - details
Each major area in detail.
H2ercule Project (Netherlands/Germany): Technical Details: Around 1,100 km of existing natural gas infrastructure being converted Operating pressure target: 50-60 bar Diameter: Primarily 36-48 inch pipelines Capacity: ~1.5 million tonnes hydrogen per year by 2030 Conversion Process: Pipeline integrity assessment using smart pigs Valve replacement program for hydrogen service Compressor station modifications Installation of new hydrogen-specific monitoring systems Timeline: Initial assessment phase: 2021-2023 First conversions: 2025 Full operation: 2030 Gradual scaling up approach Challenges: Dealing with mixed material types in existing lines Maintaining supply during conversion Cross-border regulatory alignment Material qualification programs HyBlend Research Program: Material Testing: Comprehensive testing of pipeline steels: X42, X52, X65, X70 grades Various vintage materials Different welding techniques Coating compatibility Blend Percentage Findings: Up to 20% hydrogen generally acceptable without major modifications 20-50% requires case-by-case assessment 50% typically requires significant modifications Temperature effects on blend behavior Pipeline Operator Experience: Development of new inspection protocols Modified emergency response procedures Training requirements identified Risk assessment methodologies Technical Solutions: New sealing technologies developed Modified compression solutions Advanced monitoring systems Leak detection adaptations Technical Conversion Process: Assessment Methods: In-line inspection requirements Material sampling protocols Fitness-for-service criteria Risk-based assessment approach Pipeline Preparation: Cleaning requirements: Chemical cleaning to remove hydrocarbons Mechanical cleaning for scale/debris Drying requirements Surface preparation for coating Material Replacements: Valve replacement criteria Gasket and seal specifications Compression system modifications Instrumentation updates Testing/Certification: Pressure testing protocols Leak testing methods Commissioning procedures Certification requirements Regulatory compliance verification Economic Analysis: Conversion Costs: Assessment phase: $50-100k per km Basic conversion: $200-500k per km Full upgrade: $1-2M per km Compressor station modifications: $5-20M each Operating Costs: Higher compression costs for hydrogen Modified maintenance requirements New inspection protocols Training and certification Business Case Factors: Hydrogen demand projections Carbon price assumptions Government incentives Infrastructure utilization rates Funding Approaches: Government grants Public-private partnerships Industrial consortium funding Carbon credit mechanisms Ongoing Research Needs: Materials: Long-term hydrogen effects Fatigue behavior Weld performance Coating durability Operations: Flow modeling Compression optimization Blending control Safety systems Monitoring: Real-time hydrogen detection Leak detection systems Material degradation monitoring Performance optimization Key Learnings So Far: Technical: Material compatibility is highly dependent on operating conditions Successful conversion requires comprehensive system approach Monitoring and safety systems need significant modification Quality control during conversion is critical Economic: Conversion generally cheaper than new construction Costs highly variable based on pipeline condition Operating costs higher than natural gas Business case improves with scale Regulatory: Standards still evolving Safety requirements being developed Cross-border coordination needed Certification processes being established
Disclaimer: The author of this post, may or may not be a shareholder of any of the companies mentioned in this column. No company mentioned has sponsored or paid for this content. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
IIs there a "showpiece" project that has achieved a good outcome?
As of today there isn't a clear "showpiece" complete conversion of an LNG/natural gas pipeline to 100% hydrogen service at commercial scale. Most projects are either:
In Planning/Construction: H2ercule project is often cited but still in progress European Backbone segments are mostly planned Many announcements but few completions Partial Implementation: Small test sections Limited blend percentages (<20% hydrogen) Pilot scale demonstrations Closest Examples: Air Liquide has operated some dedicated hydrogen pipelines (but these were purpose-built, not conversions) HyStock project in Netherlands (small scale) Some industrial corridor projects (limited scope) The lack of a clear showpiece project highlights some important points: Technology is still maturing Regulatory frameworks still developing Many projects announced but still in early stages Most success stories are with new construction rather than conversion
Disclaimer: The author of this post, may or may not be a shareholder of any of the companies mentioned in this column. No company mentioned has sponsored or paid for this content. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How do hydrogen powered vehicles get their H2?
Hmmm how do hydrogen powered vehicles get their H2? How is it transported to the "bowsers"?
Current Common Methods: Tube Trailers to Station Compressed gas in cylindrical tubes Typically 200-500 bar pressure Special composite or steel tubes Entire trailer exchanged or decoupled Most common current method Station Storage & Dispensing: Multi-stage compression at station Storage cascades (low/medium/high pressure banks) Typically stored at 450-500 bar Dispensed at 700 bar for passenger vehicles 350 bar for buses/trucks Cooling systems required (-40°C target) Special dispensing nozzles/protocols Pipeline Supply (Limited Locations): Some industrial areas have H2 pipelines Direct connection to stations More common in places like Germany/Netherlands Requires local compression Key Technical Elements: Compression Systems: Multi-stage compression Oil-free design Special sealing systems Cooling between stages Buffer storage Safety Systems: Leak detection Emergency shutdown Excess flow protection Grounding systems Vent stacks Fire protection
Disclaimer: The author of this post, may or may not be a shareholder of any of the companies mentioned in this column. No company mentioned has sponsored or paid for this content. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|