Australian Rare Earths

Australian Alternative Energy Forum


Not Really a Forum, more of my memory aid.


Comments on this forum should never be taken as investment advice.


Go Back   Alternative Energy Forums > Alternative Energy Discussion > Gas to Liquids

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-18-2012, 12:43 AM
Sparty Sparty is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,765
Default $14 Billion GTL plant for Louisiana

"Sasol executives say the company believes so strongly in the promise of GTL technology that this month, it announced plans to spend up to $14 billion to build the first gas-to-liquids plant in the United States, in Louisiana, supported by more than $2 billion in state incentives. A shale drilling boom in that region in the last five years has produced a glut of cheap gas, and the executives say Sasol can tap that supply to make diesel and other refined products at competitive prices."

?We believe the planets are aligned for G.T.L.,? Mr. Louw said during a recent tour of the Oryx plant. ?Other players ? much bigger players ? will follow.? http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/business/energy-environment/sasol-betting-big-on-gas-to-liquid-plant-in-us.html

And this is where it gets very interesting for Australia. We have several companies that have been front runners in the UCG-GTL space and perhaps even more importantly we have two companies that have proven UCG-GTL suitable coal resources. See CTP and LNC

That we won't use our Coal Seam Methane for liquid fuel production seems a given as we are going to struggle to get enough gas to drive the LNG projects currently being/starting to be built.

So the idea of using Underground Coal Gasification as the GAS source is most likely coming into focus. And Linc Energy (LNC) already has the working technology for UCG-GTL that makes ultra-clean diesel. CTP on the other hand has a couple of trillion tons of UCG likely coal in a remote and arid zone. To put it all into perspective Coal Seam Methane extraction uses around 5% of the available energy whereas UCG uses/extracts ~95% and to be able to do so far away from farming land and well below aquifers makes it a no-brainer.

 

Disclaimer: The author of this post, may or may not be a shareholder of any of the companies mentioned in this column. No company mentioned has sponsored or paid for this content. Comments on this forum should never be taken as investment advice.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.