% Renewable Energy by Country

[Sparty]

1 Iceland 86.87%
2 Norway 71.56%
3 Sweden 50.92%
4 Brazil 46.22%
5 New Zealand 40.22%
6 Denmark 39.25%
7 Austria 37.48%
8 Switzerland 36.72%
9 Finland 34.61%
10 Colombia 33.02%
11 Portugal 32.7%
12 Ecuador 32.35%
13 Canada 29.89%
14 Venezuela 28.43%
15 Croatia 28.27%
16 Peru 27.74%
17 Chile 26.52%
18 Latvia 23.92%
19 Vietnam 22.73%
20 Spain 22.34%
21 Sri Lanka 21.4%
22 Germany 19.45%
23 Greece 19.39%
24 Slovenia 18.77%
25 Italy 18.36%
26 United Kingdom 17.95%
27 Ireland 17.58%
28 Romania 17.48%
29 Turkey 16.52%
30 People's Republic of China 14.95%
31 Republic of Macedonia 14.82%
32 Estonia 14.33%
33 France 13.67%
34 Australia 12.93%
35 Netherlands 12.37%
36 Bulgaria 11.49%
37 Japan 11.43%
38 Argentina 11.33%
39 Philippines 10.9%
40 United States of America 10.66%
41 Pakistan 10.62%
42 Mexico 10.51%
43 Indonesia 10.39%
44 Slovakia 9.82%
45 Lithuania 9.49%
46 Belgium 9.34%
47 India 9.31%
48 Malaysia 8.06%
49 Poland 7.76%
50 Morocco 7.64%
51 Thailand 7.11%
52 Luxembourg 7.1%
53 Hungary 6.82%
54 Russia 6.62%
55 Czech Republic 6.5%
56 Egypt 6.23%
57 Ukraine 6.1%
58 Israel 5.13%
59 Kazakhstan 3.99%
60 South Korea 3.72%
61 South Africa 3.41%
62 Taiwan 3.04%
63 Uzbekistan 2.65%
64 Azerbaijan 2.2%
65 Iraq 1.5%
66 Iran 1.29%
67 Belarus 0.97%
68 Bangladesh 0.65%
69 Algeria 0.26%
70 Hong Kong 0.11%
71 Trinidad and Tobago 0.01%
72 Turkmenistan 0.01%

https://wisevoter.com/country-rankin...gy-by-country/

[Sparty]

I asked Gemini.google.com - With its vast renewable energy resources why is Australia in terms of percentage renewable energy just number 34

While Australia does possess significant renewable energy resources, several factors contribute to its ranking at 34th in terms of percentage renewable energy:

1. Dependence on fossil fuels: Australia holds vast reserves of coal and natural gas, making them a significant source of energy. This dependence on fossil fuels slows down the transition towards renewables as existing infrastructure and economic interests create inertia.

2. Policy uncertainty: The lack of consistent and long-term renewable energy policies creates uncertainty for investors, hindering investment in large-scale renewable projects. This has historically dampened growth in the sector.

3. Transmission and grid challenges: Integrating renewable energy sources like solar and wind into the national grid poses challenges. Their intermittent nature requires building more efficient transmission lines and energy storage solutions, which requires significant investment and infrastructure development.

4. Geographic factors: Australia's vast size and sparsely populated regions can pose challenges in building cost-effective and efficient transmission networks to connect remote renewable energy resources to populated areas.

However, it's important to note that Australia is making strides in the renewable energy sector, despite its current ranking. Recent years have seen increased deployment of solar and wind energy, with ambitious targets set for future growth. Government initiatives and changing public opinion could lead to a significant increase in the share of renewables in the coming years.

Here are some additional points to consider:

Comparing to other countries directly can be misleading as geographical limitations, resource availability, and economic factors differ significantly.

Rankings can vary depending on the methodology used and the data sources consulted.

The important takeaway is that while having abundant resources is a positive step, it doesn't automatically translate to rapid adoption. Several socio-economic and infrastructural challenges need to be addressed to accelerate renewable energy integration, pushing Australia further up the rankings in the future.

[Sparty]

While the Liberal National Party (LNP) has historically been less supportive of renewable energy compared to other Australian parties, it's important to understand that the situation is nuanced and complex. Here are some reasons why the LNP has faced criticism for its stance on renewables:

1. Traditional energy interests: Many LNP supporters and donors are affiliated with the traditional fossil fuel industry, which may influence their policies and priorities. Shifting towards renewables could be perceived as detrimental to these interests.

2. Economic concerns: The LNP traditionally prioritizes economic growth and job creation. They argue that the transition to renewables could lead to job losses in the fossil fuel sector, particularly in areas heavily reliant on these industries. While acknowledging the need for a transition, they emphasize a more cautious approach to minimize potential economic disruptions.

3. Concerns about reliability and cost: Some within the LNP express concerns about the reliability of renewable energy sources like solar and wind due to their intermittent nature, potentially causing disruptions to the grid. They argue that fossil fuels remain essential for a stable energy supply. Additionally, the initial costs of building renewable infrastructure can be significant, raising concerns about potential impacts on energy prices.

4. Differing views on climate change: While the LNP acknowledges climate change, some members may hold different views on the urgency and appropriate pace of action. This can influence their support for policies promoting renewable energy as a mitigation strategy.

[Sparty]

Gemini: Potential use of Alternative Energy as a political wedge:

Framing the debate: The LNP might frame the debate around protecting jobs in traditional industries and maintaining energy affordability, potentially appealing to voters who prioritize these concerns. This framing can position themselves as the party prioritizing economic concerns compared to their opponents who might be seen as prioritizing environmental concerns.

Divisive rhetoric: Some LNP members might use rhetoric that divides the public on the issue, potentially creating a sense of "us vs. them" between supporters of renewable energy and those concerned about its economic impacts. This can be seen as a strategy to solidify their base and gain support from those who share their concerns.